...my meaningless comments seem to be shaping her posts. But first, a little follow up. In
her reply to my most recent comment, she maintains her "Hitler" theme. But, that was to be expected. She also ties my comments to her liberal media [including cspan...which really made me laugh]. But, that wasn't even the most interesting part. So, I give you my comments:
Sorry about the link. Here's the appropriate link to the January report. I realized after I posted my comment that it didn't work and fixed it on my blog. Happy to help. I'm sure after you read it that you'll agree that the Bush Administration thought that the ASPCA is a bunch of terrorists.
I'm not sure what "pro abortion groups with bumper stickers" or "those who support the gay movement" have to do with anything. But I can definitely see why it's a real stretch to imagine pro-life groups or homophobes might conduct any kind of terrorism.
Lastly, could you point me to anything in the DHS report or anything the President has said which "condemn's all military vets as terrorist’s [sic] wanabees"
P.
So, I dropped a little jab about the Walter Reed scandal. It was really part of a MUCH larger point, which apparently she missed because she cut and pasted a worldnetdaily.com that she thinks proves...well, I'm not sure what. So, without laughing at the irrelevancy of the report and the nature of the source, I found one other thing funny. Apparently she had the text from the report stashed away somewhere, but couldn't manage to find the link:
Sorry I don't have the URL so I will have to post it so you can be informed on who was involved in the "Rats in Walter Reed" episode.
So, I thought I'd offer a little help.
Let me help you. Here's the link to the story.
I found out about this thing called google.com. It's a web site where you can search for words and phrases on the internets. You type in a word or phrase into the little box on their web page and it travels through the tubes to a computer. That computer shoots back web pages where those words can be found. All I had to do was copy the first sentence of the story into that box and there the site was. Crazy.
It took my 5 seconds. But, I understand you're a busy woman.
No comments:
Post a Comment